Having navigated the 2024 βintensive eraβ of HMRC scrutiny, our core mission has evolved: we believe the most successful claim is the one that never triggers a red flag.Β
Whereas compliance checks used to be random they are now AI and data driven, including benchmarking your claim to other similar claims and automated detection of 'red-flags'.
In our experience, when a claim is carefully prepared from the outsetβaligning technical narratives with financial data to avoid βanomaly detectionββany subsequent compliance check is far less painful and time-consuming.
Weβve seen first-hand that defensible claims, built on clearly articulated real-world technological uncertainties, are processed more quickly and with significantly less friction.
If your documentation hasnβt been strengthened by the lessons of 2024, you are effectively inviting an avoidable administrative burden.
There are a few common triggers for an HMRC Compliance Check or Enquiry into your R&D tax credit claim and itβs more likely that a company will get a compliance check or enquiry now, than it was a couple of year ago. While you cannot eliminate the possibility of HMRC looking into your R&D claim and the risks that entails, itβs a good idea to understand the triggers so that you donβt make yourself an easy target.
Since the Research & Development online Additional Information Form (AIF) became mandatory on 8 August 2023, HMRC has significantly stepped up scrutiny of R&D claims - now referred to as the Research & Development Expenditure Credit (RDEC).Β
Around 20% ofΒ R&D claims are now picked for review, up from around 1% before the AIF, and up from around 10% in 2022β23.Β
HMRC has hired 500+ compliance staff (up from ~100 in 2020β21), aiming to process 92% of R&D claims within 40 days while also opening checks within 12 months.
This means there is now a 1 in 5 possibility that your R&D claim will be subject to an enquiry.
Historically most of the R&D enquiries were received after an R&D claim had been settled, but there is some evidence that HMRC is now also looking into some claims before any claim settlement is made.
HMRC does not publish their methodology for conducting a compliance check, but scanning information and discussions online and looking at our own experience as specialist R&D advisor, gives some indication. Here are some pointers:
Discrepancies between numbers in the AIF and company accountsβfor instance, overstated subcontractor costsβtrigger alerts.Β
2. Weak technical justification:
Vague or shallow explanations of eligible R&Dβlike confusing business challenges with technical uncertaintiesβor failure to clearly define baseline, advance, and uncertainty in the AIF.Β
3. Large or sudden increases in claim size:
A spike in the claim size without adequate explanation (e.g., doubling year-on-year or large single claims).Β
4. High-risk sectors where R&D is deemed less likely:
Claims from sectors with historically high error rates (care homes, hospitality, construction, retailers) tend to attract more scrutiny.Β
5. Poor-quality AIF submissions:
Missed sections, lack of detail on all listed projects, or overbroad language can trigger HMRC to follow up.
6. Complex contractor relationships:
.Post-April 2024, subcontracted R&D is under intense scrutiny.
Key question: Who is actually bearing the technical risk and driving the R&D?
If this isnβt clear, HMRC will investigate.
7. Using an aggressive specialist advisor:Β
HMRC monitors claims submitted by firms known for pushing boundaries or making aggressive R&D interpretations.
Align your AIF cost data with your financial accountsβno mismatches.
Ensure the AIF contains detailed, project-by-project descriptions, clearly explaining the baseline, the technical advance being sought, and the scientific and/or technological uncertainties that necessitated R&D.
Highlight and justify any year-on-year claim increases.
Avoid using vague or βmarketingβ language like βuniqueβ or βbespokeβ without clear explanation.
Retain robust documentation and involve your Technical Professionals in the identification and writing up of your technical descriptions.
Read more about how the AIF can be a critical point of failure for R&D claims.
Use this simple checklist to assess how likely your R&D claim is to attract an HMRC enquiry.
π If you answer βNoβ or βUnsureβ to several questions, your claim may be at higher risk.
β Is your claim value consistent with previous years?
β If your claim has increased, can you clearly explain why?
β Does your claim size align with your companyβs size and activity?
β Have you clearly explained the technical or scientific advance?
β Have you identified the uncertainties faced during the work?
β Can you explain how those uncertainties were resolved?
β Would a technical expert understand and agree with your explanation?
β Have you broken your claim down by project?
β Can you clearly link staff time to specific R&D activities?
β Do your project descriptions match the costs being claimed?
β Do you have a clear and reasonable method for calculating staff time?
β Are your time allocations realistic (not overstated)?
β Do you have supporting evidence (timesheets, notes, or estimates with rationale)?
β Is it clear who is leading and controlling the R&D work?
β Are contractor costs correctly treated under current rules?
β Can you justify why those costs qualify?
β Are all claimed activities carried out in the UK?
β If not, can you clearly justify why overseas work was necessary?
β Do you have contemporaneous records (created while the work happened)?
β Are your technical descriptions detailed and specific (not generic)?
β Could you defend your claim if asked detailed questions?
β Does your AIF fully match your costs to your technical report?
β Does it align with your CT600 and financial data?
β Have all required fields been completed accurately?
β If you are claiming ERIS have you checked you meet ERIS qualification?
β Is this your first claim? If so, have you complied with the R&D Notification rule?
β Is this your first claim? If so, do you have strong supporting evidence?
β Have there been any major changes in how you calculate your claim?
β Can you clearly explain those changes?
β Is there a competent technical person who understands the R&D?
β Can they explain the work directly to HMRC if needed?
Mostly βYesβ answers
β Your claim is likely well-supported
Some βNoβ or βUnsureβ answers
β Review and strengthen documentation
Several βNoβ or βUnsureβ answers
β Your claim may be vulnerable to enquiry
HMRC enquiries are no longer random.
They are based on patterns, inconsistencies and weak evidence..
π A strong claim is not just about what you did
π Itβs about how clearly you can evidence and defend it.